Full text of the paper:
Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law, University of Novi Sad
2018, vol. LII, No. 1, pp. 399-411
Language of the paper: Serbian
Review Article
udk: 341.645:341.4
doi: 10.5937/zrpfns52-14325
Author:
Miodrag Ćujić, Ph.D. Student
University of Novi Sad
Faculty of Law Novi Sad
miodragcujic@gmail.com
Abstract:
The idea of the establishment of a Permanent International Criminal Court reached its peak thanks to the Rome Statute. Balancing between the two legal systems was an attempt to introduce a compromise the introduction of formal as well as in the material sense. The Rome Statute was a treaty by which future members, signatories, regardless of the existing differences, accept the obligations that will ensure the equality of all before the Permanent International Criminal Court. The idea of the individual cases brought before this court represented the beginning of a new international jurisprudence, however, the circumstances of a political nature, prose tentatively racial and regional peculiarities introduced come to look on the look ideal solution proceedings against the alleged work of international criminal law. Actors and factors leading up to the crisis and potentially undermine the Permanent International Criminal Court indicate necessary to introduce new forms of achieving international justice
Keywords:
the Rome Statute, justice, credibility, membership.